« April 2006 | Main | July 2006 »

June 27, 2006

Picture It!

The photos from Mayhem are up.  Photos from the first few days are here, and photos from the last couple days are here.  I've also posted some pictures from other adventures this year, including the trip to Notre Dame and two trips to WWU.

There were a lot of Mayhem photos (I got a little camera-happy, and also passed along the camera to others), and I'm a little worried that the web pages won't load properly.  If they don't, let me know and I'll divide the photos up among more than just two web pages.

---------------------------

Update:

I've changed the web pages, so there are now 6 pages of Mayhem photos: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.  I've also separated out the Notre Dame photos from the other photos from this year's adventures.  Hopefully this'll avoid browsers crashing, without my having to resize each of the photos.  (Thanks Aidan and Sam!!!)

June 26, 2006

Down With Synonyms!

The Economist tells me that the United Nations has "an official committee of geographers" to discourage the use of exonyms (the UN says an exonym is a "geographical name in a language, which is not spoken in the area in which the named object lies").  The Economist is right.

What does the UN take their justification for this to be?

"In the opinion of the UN, the use of exonyms impedes global communication."

Absolutely.  Just like speaking different languages impedes global communication.  Damn synonyms!

"In addition, their use is contrary to the UN's basic principles concerning one name for one object and thereby obstructs efforts to create international uniformity in the handling of names."

Well, having no more than one name per object certainly would've helped with Venus!

Considering the analogy between times and places, it seems to me that they're definitely on the right track with this.  It's always bothered me, for instance, that when we refer to, e.g., the distant past, we do so with contemporary language.  We should use the terms they used if we're going to refer to their time!  Really, if we're going to refer to a spacetime region, we should restrict ourselves to the names for it used in that region.  If there aren't any . . . well, the UN will figure something out!

June 25, 2006

Peanuts and Cracker Jacks

Hello, my name is Shieva, and I’m a Yankees fan.

Before my friends (especially those in the Boston area!) disown me, I should explain: I root for the Yankees because they are the underdogs.

They are, I’ve been told, the most highly paid baseball team, and they’ve dominated the World Series for much of its history. So people root against them on principle. When the Yankees win, even their fans seem to expect it; when they lose, it’s viewed as almost offensive (though, for many, still a welcome outcome). After all, how can a team lose when it has so much going for it? While I suspect diminishing returns aren't being properly taken into account, the fact that the Yankees are so widely viewed unsympathetically makes me feel bad for them. Poor Yankees!

This is kinda like when I eat a cookie, then wish I still had it. Sure, it’s gone because it’s in my stomach, and I’m the one who put it there. But that should make people feel more sorry for me, not less, because that very fact will make people extra unsympathetic, when I’m still suffering in the absence of a cookie to eat.

Anyway, mid-June I got to see my favourite team play. Aaron Exum kindly invited me along to see the Yankees play against the Cleveland Indians, in the house that Ruth built. It was the first baseball game I’d ever watched, and goodness, was I surprised.

One thing I didn’t expect was this: the fun of attending the game began before I even got to the stadium. Those who know me may be shocked to hear this, but I’m not maximally fond of sports. Why spend time watching other people run about? Why is so much money spent on something that seems so pointless? And what’s up with getting emotionally invested in who wins and loses?

On the way to the game, I began to realise it’s not as pointless as I’d thought. In Penn Station I saw people wandering around in blue t-shirts, and blue and white jerseys, with Yankees logos on them or numbers and names on the back (though at the time I wasn’t sure, I found out later that, in many cases at least, these were the names and numbers of Yankees players). They were excited and chatty, and I caught bits of sports-related conversations: “ . . . but the American League is so much cooler than . . .”, “ . . . a lot of the coaches he worked with are Cleveland . . .”. I didn’t understand most of what I was hearing, but I understood the enthusiasm and joviality carried with the words.

On the subway things got even better:  one of many relevantly similar events occurring around me, I witnessed a couple in their 70’s and two teenagers chat throughout the duration of the commute. The teenagers were wearing Yankees-regalia, which prompted the couple to ask about their interest in the team. After discussing coaches, expected outcomes of the season, how often they attended games and their favourite teams, the conversation veered toward plans for the fall, facts about their families, descriptions of hometowns, etc. (I even participated in the conversation for a while, until my confusing the Mets with the Mariners drew such an icy response that I clammed up and simply listened.)

It was fantastic to see complete strangers interact like this -- especially here, where people are typically so closed off, sometimes to the point of being rude. Though surrounded by others in this crowded city, it can be hard to find an excuse to interact, an avenue through which to forge connections with the members of the multitude. Sports give us a way to open up, to share common sentiments and create new bonds. It’s so nifty, it’s like being on the West coast again! Yup, I’m a fan of sports now.

So, by the time I got to the game I already had a favourite team and an adoration for baseball. Add to that the extensive knowledge about it that I gained from Encarta during the train ride from NJ (as well as what I knew from having watched A League of Their Own and a couple minutes of a baseball game on TV at a barbeque a few summers ago), and I was ready.

As the game progressed, I discovered two things: (i) it’s hard for me to remember to root for one team in particular, and (ii) watching baseball is stressful! These are related: I kept rooting for whoever was at bat. It was embarrassing when the Cleveland team was batting, because I’d be glad when the batter would get on base (or get a home run), and sad when the ball would be caught. Then I’d remember the implications for the Yankees that a good outcome for the batter would have, and my reaction would reverse.

Also, though I now appreciate baseball for its effects on NYC subway patrons, I’m in absolutely no hurry to watch another game. It’s normal, apparently, for batters to strike out most of the time. But I felt so bad for the batter whenever I witnessed it, it was somewhat traumatic to see it happen again and again. It surprises me that people actually use watching sports as a way to relax!

Still, it wasn’t as distressful as I make it sound: this is because I missed much of the game, since Aaron was kind enough to talk Philosophy with me. A lot of it was even baseball-related: we discussed how one might take my desire that the Yankees win to be irrational. Suppose (contrary to fact) that my desire is for the Yankees to win all of their games, and that this desire is justified by the Yankees being the underdogs. Suppose also (and also contrary to fact, given my use of ‘underdogs’) that if the Yankees won all of their games, then they wouldn’t be the underdogs anymore and my desire would no longer be justified. Then my desire is justified only as long as it isn’t fulfilled, if it's even really justified to begin with. Parfit discusses desires like this, I think, in his Climbing The Mountain (I got the link from PEA Soup, where there's an ongoing discussion of the manuscript).  Anyway, though I’m in no hurry to see batters strike out again, I’m more than happy to sit and discuss Philosophy during another baseball game!

“Oh! somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright; The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light . . .” The Yankees lost the game that day, but that just makes them all the more endearing. Here’s hoping good things for them as the season goes on. Go Yankees!!

June 23, 2006

Delay

Sorry for being late posting the Mayhem photos and the Religion Conference website.  I'll be a little bit later still -- there's one day left of a 7-day dance workshop I've been attending (5 hours of dancing a day - it's fantastic, but I'm exhausted by the time I get back to NJ!), and I'm hoping to catch up on things quickly once it's concluded.  Apologies also for my tardiness in replying to emails . . . I feel especially guilty since I don't have doing Philosophy as an excuse!

I'll post more soon - in the meantime, look what Hud made.

June 13, 2006

Rutgers Religion Conference

What the world needs now is . . . another Philosophy conference!  More specifically, it needs a student Philosophy of Religion conference.  At Rutgers.  Next January.

The world also needs this conference to be organised by someone other than me.  Unfortunately, the world isn't getting everything it needs.  More fodder for discussions on the Problem of Evil . . .

Website coming soon -- until then, here's a flier for the call for papers:  http://www.eden.rutgers.edu/~shievak/RRCall.doc

June 11, 2006

A Tale of Ineffable Bravery

Alright, here’s my second post this week (are you happy, Michael Schweiger?):

The evening of Thursday, June 1st, found me in Princeton with Joshua Spencer, a friend from college (he and his wife Bree were seniors at WWU when I started there). Complimenting the maximally profound Philosophy we were discussing, clouds gathered, lightning flashed, and rumbles of thunder permeated the air.

When the storm began to draw away from Princeton, Joshua and I gave chase. In my trusty Subaru we boldly pursued the night’s disruptor into territory hitherto unexplored by either of us:  the Jersey shore.

By the time we got there, the flashes were occurring less frequently, and instead of hitting the ground they’d retreated into the sky, streaking from cloud to cloud, sometimes across large amounts of the horizon. Still, the storm wasn’t through with us: accompanying one cloud-to-cloud display the air was filled with static that we could feel on our faces. The prickling and windlike pressure made it seem as if something had kicked up sand in our direction, but we both knew the storm was the assailant, and sand wasn’t its weapon.

After giving each other props for coming into such contact with nature’s fury, Joshua and I decided that if wading was to occur, it’d better be before another such flash swept the sky. And really, rushing to put one’s feet in water is the only rational response to finding the air to be so filled with electricity that you can see, hear and feel it.

So, with dauntless courage like that which we’d summoned when trying Vegemite with Bree over a year before, we sauntered into the ocean. A couple seconds later, the novelty of wading in the Atlantic having evaporated, we were sauntering a bit more quickly back away from the ocean. Pausing on the beach, we realised that we were the tallest objects around. On Joshua’s suggestion we rushed to stand by a lifeguard tower, so any interested lightning would hit that rather than us.

Once there, I began to think of news stories I’d heard about people dying when lightning had struck trees they were sitting under. How close to the tall objects had they been? I shared my question with Joshua. Then we ran.

Safely back in the car, we reflected on our fantastic bravery. We then contentedly left the storm alone, happy to return to New Brunswick.

June 09, 2006

There was a time, we had a time . . .

Whew! Metaphysical Mayhem concluded two days ago, and I’m still in recovery-mode. But it was incredible: There were about 60 people who attended, including 21 students from outside the region.  We listened to Metaphysics all day, talked Metaphysics into the night, caught a bit of sleep and then started again in the morning. :) Aristotle was right, those who do Metaphysics are like God: we’re in Heaven!

The best part, of course, was interacting with the other students. It’s exciting to realise that these are people I’ll get to interact with again and again for the rest of my life. I react similarly upon meeting philosophers at other conferences (most recently, at the University of Connecticut conditionals conference and the Society for Exact Philosophy Notre Dame meeting), but this was different in one important respect: this time, I got to interact with lots of people who are both my peers and interested in the same subfield of Philosophy. I’ll probably get to work with many of them in the years to come, and it’s delightful to think so!!

I have other news (as well as photos to post from Mayhem and from the SCP meeting), but I’ll sign off for now: helping organise Mayhem kept me from doing Philosophy for a while, and I’m anxious to get back to it . . .

My Photo