The puzzle continues

I've now posted my "Many-One Identity and the Trinity" paper.  In it, I consider whether accepting Strong Composition (the thesis that an object is numerically identical to the plurality of its parts) will help the Trinitarian (who, after all, is wanting 3 to be 1).  I claim it the thesis doesn't give us any options we didn't already have.  (In fact, due to worries concerning monotheism, I think that there are reasons for a monotheist Trinitarian to reject Strong Composition as identity when supplemented with Fregean counting.)

Comments would be greatly appreciated!